-Failures of the marriage equality argument: Collapses the institution of marriage with companionship, can't explain any of the 3 traditional norms of marriage in the American legal context (monogamy, sexual exclusivity, or permanency), and can't explain why government is in the marriage business (the government shouldn't be in the bedroom, and yet revisionists what the government in people's bedrooms)
-What makes a marriage a marriage is it's degree of intensity
-Philosophical:Action, goods, norms (marriage is a comprehensive relationshop in actions-unites, goods-the good of entire new life, and norms-committment of exclusivity and permanency).
-To united comprehensively you have to be able to unite is every single way. Only men and women can do that together. The action that unites the male and female is the act that brings life into the world.
-Sexual domain is what distinguishes marriage from other relationships.
Policy- What does marriage do for a community
-Unites man and women to be mother and father
-Marriage maximizes commitment
-There is no such thing as "parenting"--there is mothering and fathering and each is important to the progression of children.
-Fathers teach sons how to be masculine and manly without being violent. They teach daughters what it's like to be loved
-The government is in the marriage business because it wants to make sure that every child is conceived by a mom and dad, where the mom and dad will raise that child to maturity.
-Promoting marriage doesn't ban anything.
-Consequences of redefining marriage: No matter what, law teaches something. Undercut the traditional norms of marriage. Direct impacts on religious liberty
-No fault divorce taught that marriage wasn't a long term commitment
-The new vision of marriage will be about the intense love relationship and will presume that it only needs to last as long as the love lasts. Marriage is not about children, its about adults
-If marriage is just about an intense relationship, then why should we keep the #2? ( 1 man and 1 woman)
Thrupple: Couple of 3 married to each other
-Wedlease: Leasing a spouse...what happens to children after the lease is over?
-Monogamish: Keep the twosome, but if there's no deceit, it should be okay to sleep around.
-Marriage equality trumps individual rights
In January of 2014, Dr. Ryan T. Anderson, the William T. Simon Fellow at the Heritage Foundation, came to BYU-Idaho to give non-religious reasons for what marriage is and why it matters.
- What principles of persuasion writing did you hear in this speech?
- This is not what I will be talking about
- Past, present, future
- Breaking down arguments from the other side
- What was the basis and/or the premise for the Ryan's stance?
- If you were on the fence when it comes to this topic, how would you feel after listening to his speech?
- What marriage actually is, and what it's real purposes are, is really misunderstood.
- What was less effective about this speech?
Its not discrimination, because it's not a marriage. You are rejecting what marriage is recognized as and want your relationship of choice to be recognized.